“In its original historical meaning, a cartoon (from the Italian cartone, meaning “big paper”) may be a full-size drawing made on paper as a study for an extra artwork, like a painting or tapestry. In modern medium , a cartoon is an illustration, usually humorous in intent.” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cartoons
The current representation of conflict over the liberty to publish cartoons featuring the Prophet Muhammad (Peace Be Upon Him) in western media – because the conflict between ‘freedom of speech and expression’ and Muslim sensitivities – obscures what’s really happening at the deepest level of our collective global psyche.
I strongly believe that the publication of the infamous cartoons in Danish Jyllands-Posten was little or no about the “ongoing debate on freedom of expression that we cherish so highly”, as argued by the editors. While i feel that freedom of expression, speech and press is one among the best human accomplishments, these freedoms should be protected where and when possible and sensible but not ‘at all costs’.
That higher principles take precedence over human life is one among the central tenants of society repose on hierarchical and patriarchal values. The central tenant of a society repose on values of centrality of human (and human – nature) relatedness is to require seriously concerns and interests of worldwide human community, also because the non-human community, future generations of individuals and other living beings.
What is considered funny is usually premised on the underlying worldview. for instance , for a racist joke to be seen as funny, racism has got to be an underlying worldview, we’ve to possess an ‘inner racist’ within us. The joke about the difference between a blonde and a shopping trolley (a shopping trolley features a mind of its own) is merely funny if we still have some elements of sexism within us (as most folks , raised and living in patriarchal societies almost inevitably do). Last Year Return
If on the opposite hand, the underlying worldview is that the desire to barter – to figure things out – with ‘the other’ you become sensitive about what you’ll say, when and where about such group. you’re also careful about what sort of behaviours you select to interact in, preferring people who don’t reaffirm various sorts of direct, structural, cultural, epistemological and ecological violence.
Non-violent communication and humour
If jokes that deal in ‘bigotry, sexism, racism, ageism and every one the opposite incorrectness isms’ are the quintessential expression of bigoted, sexist, racist, orientalist, ageist and politically incorrect/hierarchically structured and (using Riane Eisler’s term) ‘dominator’ society, what sort of jokes would a fundamentally different society with a fundamentally different underlying worldview produce? for instance , what would humour be like during a society during which cultures of peace, compassion and non-violent communication are firmly embedded?
Perhaps: Cool XXL
1. People own from their own ‘stuff’. there’s an awareness of one’s own agenda, underlying worldview, assumptions, perceptions, fears, beliefs about self et al. is present. there’s also an awareness and understanding about what quite actions may have certain (violence promoting) consequences.
2. there’s an overall understanding that your speech are often a part of “> a part of the matter or part of the answer . That is, that your speech are often expression of verbal aggression or an expression of desire to barter and ‘work things out’.
3. Humour becomes a way of reducing inflated individual and collective Ego, thus you engage in laughing at self and your own group more often then in laughing at her/him/them. you furthermore may do the later, if you want to , during a safe space – verbally, with ‘your own’, faraway from the eyes and ears of her/him/them.
4. Reducing your own Ego also means you don’t identify such a lot with certain dogmatic principles and rules that help define your own individual and collective identity. That is, you’re taking offence against yourself and your own group as lightly as possible. And, most significantly of all, you don’t answer one sort of (ie. epistemological, cultural) violence with even more intense one (ie. physical, direct violence).
5. Humour becomes a way of destabilising centres of oppressive political, cultural, epistemological, economic and military power – and hopefully a way which will help create a world without institutionalised violence and social injustice. Apparently, the Muslim world is filled with Mullah jokes, and as far as i do know , portraying Mullahs isn’t seen as out of bounds by the bulk of Muslims. Such an easy editorial intervention could have spared many grievances and intense escalation of violence and still enable expression of the ‘freedom to speak’, to precise true feelings.
6. there’s a consultation with local groups, and various minorities (ethnic, religious, gender) in terms of the boundaries of free speech.
7. You manage to differentiate between different humour styles, e.g. between a ‘Joy Master’, ‘Joke Maker’, ‘Fun Meister’ and ‘Life Mocker’ (Loomans and Kolberg, 1993. p. 15). While the enjoyment Master has mostly positive qualities, is inspiring, inclusive, warm hearted, innocent, humanising and healing (ibid.) Life Mocker has mostly negative qualities, and is cynical, sarcastic, exclusive, cold hearted, worldly and dehumanising (ibid.). The positive sides of a Joke Maker (e.g. wordplay, teaching stories, parody, instructive, insightful) and Fun Meister (slapstick, clowning, naive, imitative, entertaining) are to be balanced with their negative qualities (JM: insulting, biting, satiric, stereotyping, destructive; FM: ridiculing, dark humour, tragedy and suffering, hurtful, degrading) (ibid.). Million Dollar Ideas
Whatever the societal principles, the most issue is what’s the spirit behind humour? Is it to place down others and obtain back at them, in a method or another, or to make new depths of mutual affection and compassion?
Creatively, compassionately and honestly handling the present conflict over values, freedoms and humour at the worldwide level has become the need of our times. it’s only by these means we could possibly hope to avoid an extra escalation of violence and also to guard all our freedoms
Copied with permission from: http://plrplr.com/57535/is-this-funny-can-we-develop-non-violent-humour/